Prediction of Nao Hibino [214th] vs Jessica Bouzas Maneiro [73rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W L W W L
Form
W L L L W W L W W WHead-To-Head: Hibino 0 - 0 Maneiro
| Hibino | Stats | Maneiro |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (11-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 214 | Ranking | 73 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 52 |
| 30 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 12 |
| 55% (392-325) | Career Total W/L | 66% (232-120) |
| $1,495,257 | Career Prize Money | $688,275 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nao Hibino vs Jessica Bouzas Maneiro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 0 - 0 Maneiro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 39.01% of points on their second serve, while Maneiro has won 42.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 49.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maneiro has won 51.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.28% and 37.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 49.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maneiro has saved 46.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 42.11% of matches played (W/L 24/ 33), with Maneiro winning 54.39% (W/L 31/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 283/ 216), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 49/ 59). Maneiro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 142/ 68), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 71/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13), where as Maneiro has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.14 while Maneiro has played against players with an average rank of 178.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maneiro has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maneiro has converted 38.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Nao Hibino
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
46
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Nao Hibino
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Linda Noskova
111%
(
70 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
119%
(
64 of
54)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Elena Pridankina
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
55%
(
50 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Panna Udvardy
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
68 of
131)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
66 of
131)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
46%
(
56 of
121)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
12
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
51%
(
33 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
52 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
120)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Renata Jamrichova
66%
(
92 of
139)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
6
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
8
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
65 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
129
Total Points Won
120
|
7-5 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Hibino vs Maneiro?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hibino Vs Maneiro is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (392/325) | Win/Loss | 66% (232/120) |
| 53% (872/771) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (501/286) |
| 52% (7744/7259) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3986/3163) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 986 | Aces Total | 238 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1506 | Total Double Faults | 1405 |
| 1:11:45 | Average Match Time | 1:29:51 |
| 193.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.4 |
| 65% (24406/37389) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14454/21938) |
| 61% (14802/24406) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (8576/14427) |
| 46% (6032/12980) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3326/7518) |
| 48% (2170/4566) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1644/3264) |
| 45% (16836/37664) | Return Points Win % | 50% (11108/22134) |
| 55% (385/705) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (230/346) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (84/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (35/59) |
| 57% (121/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (50/90) |
| 86% (369/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (224/200) |
| 13% (369/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (224/23) |
| 20% (348/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (127/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
